Tayisiya Morderger vs Amelie Van Impe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Aug at 02:18 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Morderger vs A. Van Impe

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win

BEL
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Morderger 0 - 1 Impe
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tayisiya Morderger winning 0 and Amelie Van Impe winning 2. The last match between Amelie Van Impe and Tayisiya Morderger was at the W50 Oldenzaal, 27-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Amelie Van Impe getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Morderger | 0 |
| Impe | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Oldenzaal(08-27-25)
T. Morderger vs A. V. Impe H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,075 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.85% (353-279) | Career Total W/L | 64.06% (123-69) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 5 | Titles | 4 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Morderger vs A. V. Impe Match Preview:
- Impe's recent second serve performance is slightly better than Morderger's, with Impe winning 38.04% of points compared to Morderger's 36.95%. Could this make a difference? It might be a small edge in Impe's favor.
- In return games, both players have strong stats against their opponent's second serves, with Morderger narrowly leading Impe, 53.29% to 52.66%. However, Impe excels in first serve returns with 34.73% compared to Morderger's 31.83%, giving Impe a clearer advantage in this area.
- When under pressure, Morderger's breakpoint saving ability is slightly superior, saving 52% compared to Impe's 50.82%. This could play a crucial role in tight moments.
- Overall match performance over the past year significantly favors Impe, who has won 68.85% of matches, whereas Morderger has only won 31.43%. Could this indicate a higher consistency level? It certainly seems so.
- Both players prefer clay, but Impe's win rate is higher at 68% compared to Morderger's 57%. On indoor hard courts, both struggle, with Impe slightly more successful at 59% versus 46% for Morderger.
- Event level exposure shows Impe dominating at lower-tier tournaments with a 74.42% win rate, while Morderger has a 30.3% win rate at higher-tier events. Is Impe's dominance at lower levels more predictive here? Possibly, though Morderger's tougher competition faces must also be considered.
- Impe has faced stronger opponents on average, with an average ranking of 100.95 compared to Morderger's 403.54. Does this experience possibly favor Impe? Most likely, yes.
- In deciding sets, Impe has a substantial edge, winning 58% of these pressure-filled encounters, while Morderger has struggled with only a 25% win rate.
- Breakpoint conversion is another aspect where Impe leads, successfully converting 46.7% of opportunities as opposed to 37.78% for Morderger.
- Past event-specific performance can be vital, so it's important to check any current event stats for additional insights.
Editorial Prediction (August 27, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent form, Impe shows stronger second serve success and exceptional first serve return prowess, suggesting a higher likelihood of breaking Morderger’s serve.
Despite Morderger’s slight advantage in saving breakpoints, Impe’s superior overall match winning percentage and successful clay surface experience further bolster their potential in the match.
Furthermore, Impe's experience beating higher-ranked opponents and prevailing in deciding sets suggests a level of resilience that Morderger has yet to develop.
Overall, the edge tends towards Impe, who is more likely to prevail in their upcoming encounter based on a comprehensive assessment of performance metrics.
Tayisiya Morderger vs Amelie Van Impe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Morderger vs A. V. Impe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:13:45 | Average Match Time | 0:13:45 |
| 38% (5/13) | 1st Serve % | 80% (4/5) |
| 60% (3/5) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 50% (4/8) | 2nd Serve Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 20% (1/5) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Morderger Recent Matches Played
A. V. Impe Recent Matches Played

T. Morderger vs A. V. Impe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.85% (353/279) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.06% (123/69) |
| 55.68% (779/620) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.73% (276/164) |
| 53.45% (6682/5819) | Games Win/Loss | 55.23% (2198/1782) |
| 52.17% (24/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.82% (34/21) |
| 56.31% (232/180) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.26% (76/37) |
| 55.75% (97/77) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.17% (13/11) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 643 | Aces Total | 206 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1390 | Total Double Faults | 548 |
| 1:1:39 | Average Match Time | 1:33:56 |
| 579.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 476.1 |
| 55% (14204/25751) | 1st Serve % | 65% (7315/11335) |
| 63% (8946/14204) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (4437/7315) |
| 44% (5120/11547) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1845/4020) |
| 51% (1625/3215) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (784/1542) |
| 47% (11763/25129) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5546/11548) |
| 25.00% (2/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.95% (164/178) | Challenger W/L | 53.33% (40/35) |
| 66.31% (187/95) | Futures W/L | 70.94% (83/34) |
| 56% (348/625) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (123/190) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (58/113) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (22/38) |
| 44% (62/140) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (28/58) |
| 87% (369/321) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (127/109) |
| 13% (369/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (127/18) |
| 11% (263/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (65/14) |